Subscribe to BrookesNews’ Bulletin
Luis Posada Carriles: Terrorist or Freedom Fighter?
Humberto Fontova
Two years ago, a Cuban exile and former CIA operative named
Among other projects, Posada helped the Reagan administration crush communism in Nicaragua by arming and training Nicaraguan Contras. Carriles’ opposition to communism earned him the hatred of
Let’s cut Posada some slack for his arrest upon entering the U.S. Seventy seven years old at the time, he had been out of the country for a while and didn’t realize that to beat an illegal immigration rap one has to march on May Day, bashing the U.S amidst a sea of foreign flags, while waving a
But then, on May 9, Federal Judge Kathleen Cardone
“Luis Posada Carriles is a CIA-trained terrorist who masterminded the bombing of a Cuban Airliner in 1976 that killed 73 innocent passengers when it crashed after lifting from the island of Barbados,” goes the standard media line. Even the normally reasonable Dick Morris got sucked into the media frenzy, writing that “Posada-Carriles richly deserves to face a Castro firing squad.” You will search these media stories in vain, however, for any mention that the accusations against Carriles regarding the plane bombing have already had their day in court — and that an independent judiciary has fully exonerated Carriles of the crime. More important still, this court ruling found Posada innocent of any material or even intellectual culpability for the crime.
The evidence examined by Venezuelan judge José Moros González in 1980 to declare Posada totally innocent was so overwhelming, authoritative and conclusive that it's small wonder Castro’s propaganda apparatus has been so frantic to squash it and to lead reporters off its trail. Among this evidence was a 200-page report from the Forensic Explosives Laboratory of Britain’s Royal Armament Research & Development Establishment, (ARDE) considered among the most authoritative for investigations of this kind. (This agency helped crack the July 2005 London subway bombings, for instance.)
The investigation into the Cubana Airline’s explosion was commissioned and the report issued, not by right wing Cuban-American crackpots, but by the government of Barbados, the nation from where the plane had departed shortly before the explosion. The investigators and authorities from Barbados retrieved bodies, baggage and portions of the plane found at the crash site. The investigation took the British agency two months and was headed by the agency’s top expert, Eric Newton, a 33-year veteran of such investigations.
The findings from the world’s top investigative agency methodically demolished every item of the Castroite version of the crime — and, hence, discredited the slanders against Carriles. For instance, one version of the events held that, at Carriles’ instigation, an explosive device was planted in the rear bathroom of the plane by a Venezuelan named Hernan Ricardo, who boarded the plane on its previous stop in Trinidad and de-planed in Barbados. By contrast, Carriles’ defense lawyers argued that the explosive device was planted in the baggage compartment of the plane at the instigation of a Castro double-agent named Ricardo Morales Navarette, during a stop in Guyana.
The ARDE findings support the defense, determining that the explosion came from the baggage compartment of the plane. “It would have been impossible for an explosion in the plane’s bathroom to cause the type of damage we found,” concluded the ARDE report. “The explosion definitely came from the baggage compartment.”
Questions about what type of device was used in the explosion led to further vindication for Carriles. According to one version, Carriles used a type of explosive device known as C-4. Defense lawyers maintained that, in fact, commercial dynamite formed the basis of the explosive device. Once again, the defense was right. The ARDE report found “no traces of any chemical found in C-4 explosives” and instead found traces of nitroglycerine, a component of commercial dynamite. It is worth noting that ARDE investigators offered to raise the entire plane from the sea’s bottom — and were rebuffed by none other than Fidel Castro, who likely suspected that this would destroy his case against Carriles.
Finally, there is already a confession to the plane bombing of which Carriles is accused. It comes in the form of deposition in Dade County’s 11th Judicial court dated April, 5 1982 — and it’s from a Castro double-agent named Ricardo Morales Navarette. Such details, of course, only serve to arouse suspicion about Luis Posada Carriles’ guilt and cast doubt on his reputation as a “terrorist.” No wonder you won’t find them mentioned by the media.
Humberto Fontova is the author of Exposing the Real Che Guevara and the Useful Idiots Who Idolize Him and
Fidel: Hollywood’s Favorite Tyrant.
Brookes: Mark Coultan, a leftwing Washington correspondent for the equally leftwing The Age, immediately sided with the Justice Department against Luis Posada Carriles: The media covers for the murderous Fidel Castro and does his dirty work. But then his sleazy lefty rag has a history of covering up Castro’s crimes.
BrookesNews.Com
Monday 4 June 2007